Audio Format Wars Essay, Research Paper
Audio Format Wars
By: Sheldon Khan
Before purchasing a new auto, acquiring married, or following a new audio format it is wise to inquire a few inquiries, equal under the goon, and inquire the advice of person you trust. Will the new format fulfill your demands non merely now but, besides in the hereafter? Will it look ( and sound ) as good on all the forenoons after you foremost met?
The parallel cassette is an old and trusted versatile friend that went with you on those forenoon jogs and cruised in the auto with you on Friday darks. However, the powers that be, hold declared our sure friend to be in the last stage of the life rhythm. It & # 8217 ; s replacement must sound better, work better, and have new characteristics such as a digital show for vocal rubrics. There are presently two formats viing to be the consumers next pick for sound on the spell. They are Philips & # 8217 ; Digital Compact Cassette ( DCC ) and Sony & # 8217 ; s Mini Disc ( MD ) .
What precisely is digital entering? The definition is, & # 8220 ; An electronic format that is designed to double sound, while affording highly accurate control over any alterations you might wish to do in the recording & # 8221 ; ( Mclan & A ; Wichman,1988 ) . In simple footings it means that the digital circuitry samples the signal and so reproduces what it has seen. The quality of the entering depends on the trying rate of the machine. The sampled signal is so encoded to the tape or phonograph record in 1 & # 8217 ; s and 0 & # 8217 ; s, merely like a computing machine disc thrust would encode information. However, the biggest advantage of digital recording is the fact that it eliminates tape & # 8220 ; hiss & # 8221 ; that is normally found nowadays in linear recordings.
In the Eightiess, a Philips innovation captured the spotlight. The Compact Disc introduced us to a new epoch of digital sound, or & # 8220 ; perfect sound. & # 8221 ; In the 1890ss another Philips innovation has taken centre-stage, the Digital Compact Cassette ( DCC ) . DCC is the matrimony of the parallel cassette to Digital Audio. Together they form a brotherhood that combines perfect sound, high convince and greater versatility. & # 8221 ; DCC is a medium on which audio information is digitally encoded and which reproduces CD quality sound & # 8221 ; ( Philips Electronics, Sound & A ; Vision, 1995 ) . A figure of characteristics have been incorporated into DCC tapes and decks to accomplish Cadmium like sound and convince. DCC decks can turn up a chosen path on either side of the tape because path and clip codifications are recorded on the tape. This combined with autoreverse, which is standard on all DCC decks, makes path entree effortless but, non every bit fast as a Cadmium. Another attractive characteristic of DCC is the text manner. Text manner allows the deck to expose support information about the recordings on the tape such as the album rubric, a complete list of path rubrics, names of the creative persons on each path, and wordss ( displayed in sync with the music ) . Television screens or remote control units can besides be connected to the deck to expose more extended information. The tapes have entering and playback times of 60, 90, and 100 proceedingss. & # 8220 ; The well known lastingness of cassettes is enhanced by the usage of videochrome tape: Cr dioxide- or cobalt- doped ferric-oxide & # 8221 ; ( Philips Electronics, Sound & A ; Vision, 1995 ) . With the new tape shell, the tape and tape thrust wheels, which are exposed on the parallel tape, are concealed by a metal skiding panel called a & # 8220 ; skidder & # 8221 ; . The skidder helps protect the tape from soil and dust which contributes to tape dislocation. This along with the videochorme tape and DCC & # 8217 ; s digital mistake rectification system help forestall tape dropout. Numerous digital first coevals DCC to DCC transcripts can be made. Any farther transcripts ( Internet Explorer. 2nd, 3rd, etc coevals ) made from the first coevals transcript will non be digital. The biggest advantage that DCC has over the competition is its compatibility with its parallel predecessor.
Sony & # 8217 ; s Mini Disc is a miniature version of the compact phonograph record that comes in a plastic shell like that of a 3 1/2 computing machine diskette. & # 8220 ; Unlike CD & # 8217 ; s, MiniDiscs can be recorded utilizing magneto-optical engineering & # 8221 ; ( Dmytryk, 1993, p. 62 ) . Mage
to-optical engineering allows a MiniDisc to be recorded on many times. A MiniDisc is smaller than a DCC tape and has random track entree like a Cadmium. It besides gives the user the capableness to redact vocals, and the order that they appear in on the phonograph record. To enter on a partly full phonograph record, merely hit Record, with no concern for prompting. Recording starts instantly and the new stuff is added as a new path. It is besides simple to take dead air and unwanted stuff. The deleted clip is added to the entire clip staying on the phonograph record. All of this makes it really easy to make your ain usage digests. The MiniDisc, like the DCC allows the user to do multiple first coevals digital transcripts. But 2nd and 3rd coevals transcripts will non be digital. One of the biggest advantages that MD has over DCC is it’s little slim size and lastingness. By comparing the crisp edged DCC cassette seems a spot gawky and less lasting.
Both MD and DCC use data-compression techniques to squash digital sound informations into a fraction of the infinite required by a Cadmium or a Digital Audio Cassette ( DAT ) . & # 8221 ; DCC & # 8217 ; s Precision Adaptive SubCoding ( PASC ) achieves somewhat better than 4-to-1 compaction. While Mini Disc & # 8217 ; s Adaptive TRansform Acoustic Coding ( ATRAC ) is somewhat worse at 5-to-1 & # 8243 ; ( Dmytryk, 1993, p. 65 ) .
Both developers justify the usage of compaction with these statements,
& # 8220 ; The human ear merely hears sounds above a certain volume ( dubnium ) degree, called the hearing threshold. The threshold of hearing depends on the frequence of the sound. Therefore, merely sounds above this dynamic threshold demand to be recorded. & # 8221 ; ( Philips Electronics, Sound & A ; Vision, 1995 )
Loud sounds can wholly dissemble softer sounds that are near in frequence. Because our hearing is far more acute in the mid-range than at the high or low terminal of the spectrum, what you hear is defined by the frequence content during each clip slice. & # 8221 ; ( Dmytryk, 1993 p. 65 ) .
In other words no 1 will cognize the difference if certain frequences are losing.
What will all of this new engineering cost the mean consumer? Well, a Philips DCC deck cost about $ 600, pre-recorded DCC tapes cost about $ 20, and clean tapes cost about $ 8. While a MD participant cost about $ 500, the pre-recorded phonograph record cost about $ 20 and the clean phonograph record cost about $ 10. Of class as the popularity of the format grows, the cost will drop.
Manufacturers are seeking to give the populace a more lasting and better sounding medium for those of us that are ever on the spell. However, since their debut about three old ages ago really few MD and even fewer DCC participants have been sold. Some audio experts feel that the ground they have non sold many units of either format is because the mean individual thinks that there is nil incorrect with the sound quality of a good CrO2 ( Maxell & # 8217 ; s XLII ) or metal ( Sony & # 8217 ; s CDit IV ) parallel cassette. Many people still live by the old expression, & # 8220 ; If it ain & # 8217 ; t broke, wear & # 8217 ; t repair it. & # 8221 ; Manufacturers have built up these new formats as & # 8220 ; the greatest thing since piece staff of life, & # 8221 ; in the hopes of altering the manner people listen to music. Yet, the populace has non jumped on the set waggon of either of these new formats. However, one thing is certain, the yearss of the parallel cassette are numbered.
It is merely a affair of clip before either MD, DCC or some new digital format such as the recordable Cadmium takes the topographic point of the parallel cassette.
Ballou, Glen. Handbook For Sound Engineers ( 2nd ed. ) . Indiana: Sams, 1991.
Davis, Don & A ; Carolyn. Sound System Engineering. Indianapolis, Indiana: Howard W. Sams & A ; Co Inc, 1975.
Dmytryk, George. & # 8220 ; Digital Debate. & # 8221 ; Electronic Musician, Vol 9 No.8, 1993, August: 62-70.
Mclan, Peter & A ; Wichman, Larry. The Musican & # 8217 ; s Guide To Home Recording. Toronto: Simon & A ; Schuster Inc, 1988.
Robertson, Patrick. The Book Of Firsts. New York: Bramhall House, 1974.
Sony Home Page. www.sony.com. electronic mail: webmaster @ sony.co.jpDigital Compact Cassette. Philips Electronics N.V. ( 1995 ) .