Factors Affect Colonisation Of New Habitats Biology Essay

Freshwater home grounds like pools are under diminution and face menaces including change of home grounds, pollutants, agricultural intensification and urbanization. Even though late pool Numberss have been increasing many are degraded and of hapless quality.

Ponds frequently contain a considerable sum of diverseness and are an of import refugee for many threatened species.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

To better understand pool communities and to be able to continue them inquiries such as what factors affect colonization of pools need to be answered.

16 semisynthetic mesocosms installed in 2011 were studied under a 12 week-period utilizing a Latin Square design to see if shade and sediment affected what sort of copiousness and diverseness was found in the mesocosms.

Merely one species ( Diaptomus ) colonized the pools whereas 13 species overall were found during the 12-week period.

No difference between interventions was found, proposing that shadiness and deposit do non impact which macroinvertebrates and zooplankton colonize the pools. Vegetation, connectivity and bing communities may play more of import functions in structuring pool communities.

Contentss

Introduction 3

MATERIAL & A ; METHODS 8

RESULTS 10

DISCUSSION 13

Mentions 20

Introduction

Understanding the procedures behind colonization and factors impacting aquatic communities is important for the ability to continue fresh water home grounds. The biological diverseness found in these sorts of home grounds is under rapid diminution and exceeds that found in many tellurian ecosystems. Menaces include changes and devastations of home grounds, pollutants and the force per unit areas exerted by the growing of the human population ( Dudgeon et al. 2006 ) .

Urbanization, the motion of people into metropoliss from rural countries, is a go oning phenomenon with over half ( 3.3 billion ) of the universes ‘ population life in urban countries in twelvemonth 2008 ( UNFPA 2007 ) . An urban country is defined as an country with high human denseness and/or linked to commercial or industrial activities ( Loram et al. 2007 ) . 4.9 billion people are expected to be populating in urban countries in 2033 and though most growing will happen in developing states, urban countries in the developed universe are still expected to spread out 2,5 times by 2030 ( UNFPA 2007 ) . The urban country in the UK makes up about 6.8 % of the entire country but contains about 80 % of the population ( UK National Ecosystem Assessment 2011 ) . Urban countries affects more than merely the entire country they cover since the activities in metropoliss affect landscapes nearby and they contribute to pollution ( Goddard et al. 2010 ) . The population is predicted to turn from the 62 million today to 77 million in 2033 and by 2021 there will be a demand for 3.8 million excess families ( UK National Ecosystem Assessment 2011 ) . This demand does non come merely from population growing but besides from societal alterations since more people are populating entirely and for longer which in bend decreases the mean size of families ( Gaston et Al. 2005b ) . This procedure of increased urbanization has large effects on biodiversity and more frequently than non the effects are negative. Urbanization has been found to alter the land screen, alter and fragment home grounds, increase the pollution and ambient temperature to call but a few, negatively impacting the species profusion and the complexness of ecosystems ( Tratalos et al. 2007 ; Goddard et al. 2010 ) .

Gardens in urban countries are frequently considered to positively impact wildlife, particularly since they in many instances cover a big sum of the entire urban country. In the UK, Numberss range between 22-27 % of the entire country depending on the metropolis ( Goddard et al. 2010 ) . Their impact on biodiversity is attributed by their map as a home ground and their map in linking home grounds to each other ( Davies et al. 2009 ) . Gardens, particularly in suburban countries, can be really of import to wildlife and some species have been found to hold more stable populations at that place than in rural countries due to the heterogeneousness nowadays in these sort of countries ( Goddard et al. 2010 ) . Gardens could in all chance be used more in conserving biodiversity but there are some issues. Gardens are in private owned so they fall outside the direct control of authorities or local governments and the information on how to increase the biodiversity in gardens is limited. However, the research done on biodiversity in gardens in urban countries is increasing, with the Biodiversity in Urban Gardens in Sheffield Project ( BUGS ) holding carried out extended research on both the vegetation and zoologies and factors impacting their diverseness in urban gardens.

Ponds have been pointed out to be a manner of heightening the biodiversity in gardens every bit good as being an of import portion of fresh water home grounds. Ponds can be described in many ways depending on the focal point ( e.g. deepness, size, type of H2O supply ) and no consentaneous definition exists although one common definition is one stated by the Pond Conservation Organisation in the UK: “ a organic structure of H2O which can change in size between 1 M2s and 2 hectares and which holds H2O for four months of the twelvemonth or more ” ( Oertli et al. 2005 ; Pond Conservation 2013 ) . Still, because there is no official definition, there is no individual value of how many pools there are in the UK. The Countryside Survey Report in 2007 estimated the figure of pools to be about 478A 000 whereas estimations of 3.5 million pools found merely in gardens have besides been made ( Goddard et al. 2010 ) . These immense differences in Numberss is due to the fact that these estimations have used different definitions, with a lower limit of 25 M2s in size needed in the first estimation for a H2O organic structure to represent as a pool whereas the average size of a pool in the 2nd estimation was merely 1 M2. Ponds can and hold been created by natural procedures like glaciation and more simple procedures like the falling of a tree but in modern clip anthropogenetic procedures have an increasing control over the creative activity and devastation of pools ( Wood, Greenwood & A ; Agnew 2003 ; Pond Conservation 2013 ) .

As mentioned before, fresh water home grounds are under increasing menace and pools are particularly vulnerable since they in many instances are non recognized as being an of import home ground. Ponds are being lost due to agricultural intensification, urbanization every bit good as industry and conveyance developments and this loss has been particularly great during the last two decennaries ( Boothby 1995 ; Wood, Greenwood & A ; Agnew 2003 ) . New pools are besides being created so the turn-over is high, with an estimated 18A 000 pools lost and 70A 600 created between 1998 and 2007. Many of the new pools are of better quality compared to some older 1s although largely it is non cognize what the quality of the pools lost were so it is hard to state whether the addition of new pools compensates for the loss of the old 1s ( Countryside Survey 2007 ) .

Many new pools are created in gardens but these are non normally interchangeable to the pools lost in the wider landscape due to them frequently being little, intensely managed and incorporating cosmetic fish species ( Loram et al. 2007 ) . There is besides grounds that the quality of pools has declined since 1996 and now about 80 % of pools are of hapless or really hapless quality ( Countryside Survey 2007 ) . This is particularly distressing since pools have been found to incorporate much biodiversity, back uping the most species and highest figure of rare species therefore lending the most to regional biodiversity in aquatic systems ( Biggs et al. 2005 ) . Many species are known to populate pools and over 2/3 of UK fresh water animate beings and workss are found in pools, besides including many threatened species ( Countryside Survey 2007 ) . Despite this, pools have frequently been neglected in surveies to the favor of other H2O organic structures like rivers and lakes. Long-run datasets and a larger apprehension is available for these but pools are less understood in the footings of how they function and how they should be managed ( Wood et al. 2003 ; Biggs et Al. 2005 ) . Without the information on how they function and what factors affect beings in pools proper action to conserve them can non be taken. Merely presuming what is best wo n’t work, sing the fact that until late pools were non even considered of import and past errors have been made, for illustration the action to dredge passing pools and doing them lasting or taking flora from pools and in bend losing some of the zoology that prefer passing or dumbly vegetated pools ( Biggs et al. 2001 ) . Knowledge of pool ecology and map is going progressively of import, since the force per unit area of urbanization every bit good as future clime alteration are seting pools under even more force per unit area ( Bronmark & A ; Hansson 2002 ; Wood, Greenwood & A ; Agnew 2003 ) . To be able to supply home grounds for species in the signifier of pools, cognition about possible factors that may impact their colonization and ability to prevail in an aquatic community is of import.

Some recent work has been conducted on pools in both experimental scenes and in gardens ( Jenkins 1998 ; Brady et al. 2002 ; Caeceres & A ; Soluk 2002 ; Gaston et al. 2005 ; Frisch & A ; Green 2007 ) but most of the old surveies sing fresh water has lasted under a twelvemonth ( Stendera et al. 2012 ) . Many of the surveies have besides non drop their pools into the land due to different limitations ( Caeceres & A ; Soluk 2002 ; Gaston et al. 2005 ) . The pool undertaking traveling on at the University of Reading, which this experiment is a portion of, is besides supplying of import information about pools. These mesocosms are sunk into the land, supplying a more natural lay-out. Hopefully this undertaking will supply information about the alterations in aquatic communities and physiochemical informations over clip, supplying a long-run information set.

The chief inquiries this experiment is inquiring is which physical variables affect the colonization of freshly formed aquatic home grounds. Two variables are being tested in a Latin Square Design: visible radiation exposure and sediment base beds. Extra inquiries are whether there is any relationship between the physiochemical consequences every bit good as the biological informations and the physiochemical consequences. The biological information is looked at both from an copiousness and an diverseness point of view. The reply to these inquiries can so perchance be applied to existent life state of affairss, for illustration when put ining a pool in a garden to advance biodiversity. Since pools are so ill studied and understood these sorts of consequences will convey critical information to this country of research.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

16 semisynthetic mesocosms every bit spaced apart were used in this experiment ( Table 1 ) . The experiment location was on campus at the University of Reading. A Latin Square design with 1.5 m x 1.5 m spacing in each Latin Square was applied for this experiment. The pools were dug out in 2011 and consist of containers sunk into the land that were filled with tap H2O and so left to stand to be of course colonized. The volume of the pools are between 35 and 40 litres ( depending on rainfall ) with the approximative steps of 41 centimeter in diameter and a tallness of 29 centimeter. One-half of the pools are shaded, which was done by a building of wire and nylon sheeting ( windbreaker cloth ) in a half circle format shadowing the pools a 100 % at mid twenty-four hours. The country of a shadiness is 0,25 M2 with approximative steps of a length of 80 centimeter and a tallness of 52 centimeter. One-half of the pools are seeded, intending they had received 1.5 kilograms of dirt that was sifted in a 4 millimeter screen during the building of the mesocosms. The dirt originated from the grid country so that no new chemicals were introduced to the pools. Treatment A consisted of seeded and un-shaded pools, intervention B of seeded and shaded pools, intervention C of un-seeded and un-shaded pools and intervention D of un-seeded and shaded pools and each intervention had 4 replicates. Plant species turning really near or into the pools were removed.

Physiochemical and biological sampling started on 2.10.2012 and ended on 18.12.2012. The samples were taken of the pools weekly at around 10 am although some measurings had to be taken subsequently in the twenty-four hours due to personal restraints. The physiochemical measurings taken were ph, temperature, conduction, dissolved O and H2O transparence. The pH, temperature, conduction and dissolved O was measured utilizing electronic metres from Hanna Instruments with the theoretical account HI9024 used for pH and temperature, HI9142 for dissolved O and HI8733 for conduction. The pH investigation had jobs during hebdomad 9 of sampling, demoing the same figure for all pools and broke in hebdomad 10 of trying so no consequences were obtained from hebdomad 9 to hebdomad 12 and these hebdomads were ignored in the consequences. The H2O transparence was measured utilizing a Secchi disc. Biological samples were ever taken after the physiochemical samples had been taken. A little manus net consisting of aquatic fish cyberspace ( length 9.5 centimeter and width 7.5 centimeter ) was used to roll up specimens by revolving it in a figure eight gesture three times at three different degrees ( near to surface, center of pool and shut to bottom ) .

After aggregation specimens were put in tubing ( one tubing for each pool ) that were filled with tap H2O. When taken to the lab, the tubings were put in a electric refrigerator. One tubing at a clip was so poured into a tray and specimens were identified utilizing keys ( Macan 1962 ; Scourfield & A ; Harding 1966 ; Disney 1975 ; Croft 1986 ; Cranston et al. 1987 ; Elliot, Humpesch & A ; Macan 1988 ; Smith 1989 ; Henderson 1990 ; Greenhalgh & A ; Ovenden 2007 ; Alberti et Al. 2013 ) and the entire figure of each species was counted. Due to the big Numberss of waterfleas nowadays an approximative count of these were taken where one eight of the tray was counted and that figure was multiplied by eight. The purpose was to place every specimen down to species degree but due the presence of specimens notoriously hard to place without specializer cognition some were merely identified down to household or genus degree. After designation and numeration, the contents of the tray were emptied back into the tubing which was put back into the electric refrigerator. When the contents of all tubings had been looked at, they were transported back to the pools so as to non consume the resources of the pools.

The Kruskal-Wallis one manner analysis of discrepancy was used to observe any differences between interventions of copiousness and diverseness. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to observe any specific consequence of shadiness or deposit on copiousness and diverseness. Spearman ‘s rank correlativity coefficient was used to observe any relationship between the physiochemical variables every bit good as any relation between the physiochemical variables and the copiousness or diverseness.

A1

B1

D1

C1

B2

C2

A2

D2

C3

D3

B3

A3

D4

A4

C4

B4

Table 1. Latin Square Design of the pools.

Consequence

13 species were found during the experiment with seemingly changing ability to colonise the pools ( Table 2 ) . 5 species colonized all of the pools: the larvae of common house mosquitoes ( Culex pipiens ) , the larvae of seize with teething midges ( Ceratopogonidae ) , lesser water-boatmen ( Sigara nigrolineata ) and two species of H2O fleas ( Daphnia Pulex and Scapholeberis mucronata ) . Other species were merely found in one or really few pools: Ghost midge larvae ( Chaoborus americanus ) in one pool, seed runts ( Cypridoidea ) in two pools and copepods ( Diaptomus ) in 5 pools. Individual ponds contained a maximal value of 7 to 11 taxa.

Common Name

Taxonomy

1-10

11-30

30-100

101-1000

& gt ; 1000

Number of pools

Water flea

Daphnia Pulex ( Daphnidae ; Cladocera )

ten

16

Water flea

Scapholeberis mucronata ( Daphnidae ; Cladocera )

ten

16

Common House Mosquito

Culex pipiens ( Culicidae ; Diptera )

ten

16

Biting Midge

( Ceratopogonidae ; Diptera )

ten

16

Lesser waterboatmen

Sigara nigrolineata ( Corixidae ; Hemiptera )

ten

16

Mayfly

Cloeon dipterum ( Baetidae ; Ephemeroptera )

ten

14

Non-biting midge

( Chironomidae ; Diptera )

ten

11

Mosquito

Anopheles claviger ( Culicidae ; Diptera )

ten

10

Meniscus midge

Dixella aestivalis ( Dixidae ; Diptera )

ten

8

Copepod

Diaptomus ( Diaphomidae ; Diaptomus )

ten

5

Predacious diving beetles

( Dytiscidae ; Coleoptera )

ten

4

Seed runt

( Cypridoidea ; Podocopida )

ten

2

Ghost midge

Chaoborus americanus ( Chaoboridae ; Diptera )

ten

1

Table 2. Speciess populating the pools. The different Numberss represent the maximal figure of the same species found during a sampling of one pool and the figure of pools refers to how many pools it was found in during the experiment. Taxonomic names represent species or genus name and the household and order names are in brackets.

The physiochemical values varied with the hebdomads ( Appendix 1 ) . The pH had a scope of 7.76 to 12.47 with an norm of 9.86 ( A± 0.02 SE ) , the sum of dissolved O had a broad scope of 0.2 to 16.1 mg/Lwith an norm of 4.2 mg/L ( A± 0.4 SE ) and the temperature ranged from 13.8 grades to 1.0 degree Celsius with an norm of 8.5 grades ( A± 0.02 SE ) ( Figure 1 ) . The conduction ranged from 126 AµS/cm to 320 AµS/cm with an norm of 190 ( A± 22 SE ) AµS/cm ( Figure 2 ) . The Secchi disc measurings had a scope of 6 centimeter to 20 centimeter and the disc was merely used in one pool ( A3 ) since the remainder of them stayed clear trough-out the experiment ( Appendix 2 ) .

Figure 1. The scopes of the physiochemical variables ( pH, dissolved O and temperature ) among the different interventions. The outliers of dissolved O in intervention A are values of 14,9 and 16,1, in intervention B 14,2 and 15,2, in intervention C 14,6 and in intervention 15,8. These values were all recorded in hebdomad 12.

Figure 2. The scopes of conduction among the different interventions. The outliers consist of values of 320 ( Treatment B ) and 307 ( Treatment C ) . These were recorded in hebdomad 1.

Alternatively of grouping all the consequences together, hebdomad 1, 6 and 12 was included in the statistical testing. The Kruskal-Wallis one manner analysis was performed to look into for an consequence of the intervention on both copiousness and diverseness so wholly in all 6 trials were performed. There was no important consequence of intervention on diverseness in hebdomad 1 ( H ( 3 ) = 5,84, P = 0,120 ) , in hebdomad 6 ( H ( 3 ) = 1,61, P = 0,658 ) or in hebdomad 12 ( H ( 3 ) = 0,87, p= 0,833 ) . There was no important consequence of intervention on copiousness in hebdomad 1 ( H ( 3 ) = 1,51, P = 0,680 ) in hebdomad 6 ( H ( 3 ) = 2,38, p= 0,497 ) or in hebdomad 12 ( H ( 3 ) = 2,23, P = 0,526 ) . The Mann-Whitney U trial was performed to look into of any peculiar influence of deposit or shadow individually on the diverseness or copiousness in hebdomad 1, 6 and 12 every bit good. There was no important consequence of shadiness on diverseness in hebdomad 1 ( W= 63,5, p= 0,674 ) , in hebdomad 6 ( W= 73,0, p= 0,618 ) or in hebdomad 12 ( W= 67,5, p= 1,00 ) and the same was true for copiousness in hebdomad 1 ( W= 65,5, p= 0,833 ) , in hebdomad 6 ( W= 66,0, p= 0,875 ) or in hebdomad 12 ( W= 71,0, p= 0,793 ) . There was no important consequence of deposit on diverseness in hebdomad 1 ( W= 81,0, p= 0,131 ) , in hebdomad 6 ( W= 59,0, p= 0,347 ) or in hebdomad 12 ( W= 59,5, p= 0,385 ) and the same was besides true for copiousness in hebdomad 1 ( W= 58,0, p= 0,318 ) , in hebdomad 6 ( W= 54,0, p= 0,156 ) or in hebdomad 12 ( W= 61,0, p= 0,495 ) .

Spearman ‘s rank correlativity coefficient was used to observe if there were any important relationship between the physiochemical variables and the physiochemical variables and copiousness or diverseness. There were five statistically important relationships between the physiochemical variables ( Figure 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 ) . These were O and pH ( Rs ( 14 ) = 0,640, p= & lt ; 0,01 ) , copiousness and pH ( Rs ( 14 ) = -0,583, p= 0,01 ) , temperature and conduction ( Rs ( 14 ) = 0,748, p= & lt ; 0,005 ) , pH and conduction ( Rs ( 14 ) = -0,709, p= & lt ; 0,005 ) and O and conduction ( Rs ( 14 ) = -0,694, p= & lt ; 0,01 ) .

Figure 3. The positive correlativity between O and pH.

Figure 4. The positive correlativity between temperature and conduction.

Figure 5. The negative correlativity between copiousness and pH.

Figure 6. The negative correlativity between pH and conduction.

Figure 7. The negative correlativity between O and conduction.

Spearman ‘s rank correlativity coeffcicient was besides used to see if there was any relationship between mosquitoes ( Culex pipiens and Anopheles claviger ) and Daphnia Pulex.

Discussion

Treatment was non found to significantly impact copiousness or diverseness and shadiness or deposit did non separately affect copiousness or diverseness either. In fact, copiousness and diverseness seemed to remain instead changeless trough out the experiment ( Figure 8 and 9 ) even though there were noticeable hebdomadal fluctuations in copiousness which either relates to existent fluctuations in the copiousness or an consequence of sampling and appraisal of waterflea Numberss ( Figure 10 ) .

Figure 8. Weekly cumulative entire copiousness of the different interventions.

Figure 9. Weekly cumulative mean diverseness of the different interventions.

Figure 10. Fluctuations of hebdomadal sum copiousness between the interventions.

The physiochemical variables were rather similar in each intervention as can be seen from Figure 1 and 2 and it is likely that these differences were non large plenty to impact the species populating in the pools and therefore no difference showed in the interventions when comparing copiousness and diverseness. The conduction values are quite mean for a fresh water environment. For pools conduction has been found to run anyplace between 13 and 2560 AµS/cm and since our scope was comparatively little ( 126 – 320 AµS/cm ) it is improbable to hold any large impact on the species in the pools, particularly since the average value was comparatively low ( Countryside Survey 2007 ) . The average O value is tolerated by a assortment of invertebrates particularly since they as a group have a broad scope of tolerance, nevertheless the lower scopes of O ( under 2 mg/L ) might hold affected the organisms life in the pools ( Canadian Council of the Ministers of the Environment 1999 ) . It is besides possible that the equipment was non working ideally, particularly since it measured systematically low Numberss ( under 2 and down to 0.2 mg/L ) for a few hebdomads and so the degrees all of a sudden jumped up to every bit high as 16.1 mg/L in hebdomad 12. The low scopes may besides hold resulted from coverage of ice forestalling re-aeration since a hebdomad after the ice foremost appeared the O dropped down low. It is perplexing though that some species seemed to increase in Numberss even when the O degrees measured dropped down to every bit low as 0.2 mg/L. One illustration is the dayfly nymphs, which were found most abundant in hebdomad 11 after 4 hebdomads of low O values even though dayflies have been found to necessitate high O degrees in Waterss. The species present in our pools, Cloeon dipterum, is one of the more tolerant species and is found in a broad scope of O degrees ( Lock & A ; Goethals 2011 ) , nevertheless some hebdomads the O values dropped to the really terminal of its tolerance so it is still surprising the species did so good. The pH value is higher than the mean values found for pools in England with the norm of 9.86 in our pools compared to the regional mean of 7.2, although mean values up to 10.1 were besides found regionally ( Countryside Survey 2007 ) . pH was perchance a modification factor for some species as for illustration, pH values of 10.5 to 11 have been found lethal to some species of stone flies and darning needles and the highest species profusion in invertebrates have been found to be in the scopes of 4.09 to 8.56 and a pH over 9 reduced profusion ( National Research Council ( U.S. ) ; Committee on Water Quality Criteria, 1972 ; Berezina 2001 ) . This might besides explicate why pH and copiousness was found to hold a negative relationship since a bead in pH would hold meant that the value was better tolerated by the species. The relationships between the physiochemical variables found important were positive relationships between O and pH and between conduction and temperature and negative relationships between conduction and pH and between conduction and O. A positive relationship between O and pH has besides been found in other surveies ( Araoye, P.A. 2009 ) and a positive relationship between conduction and temperature is besides expected since conduction measures the capableness of a solution to go through an electrical current which is higher when there are more ions in the H2O and as the temperature gets higher the ions become more nomadic in the solution which leads to an addition in conduction ( Jenway 2010 ) . The relationship between pH and conduction is likely due to the fact that both of them can be affected by the same factor, in this instance ions in the H2O, instead than the two factors straight impacting each other. The same might be true for the relationship found for O and conduction. The sum of O the H2O can keep lessenings with a higher salt and a higher salt would take to a higher value of conduction as good ( Schwartz 2006 ) .

Successful colonisation includes two phases: to get at a new home ground and to prevail in the home ground. Processes involved in structuring communities can be divided into two wide classs: local procedures which involve abiotic and biotic factors that affect the continuity of species and regional procedures which involve dispersion among sites and the extinction of local populations ( Cottenie et al. 2003 ) . If the rate of dispersion is much bigger than extinction rate, home grounds will incorporate the species whereas if dispersion is rare, species will frequently be absent in home grounds. Divers communities can frequently do it hard for new species to prevail and so these may hold high extinction rates. This is thought to be because of more species use up more of the resources and many of the niches may already be taken ( Shurin 2000 ) . Shurin ( 2000 ) found that over 91 % of the species he introduced to bing pools became nonextant and that the more species a pool contained, the harder it was for the introduced species to occupy. Zooplankton has been found to be able to scatter over big distances and frequently rapidly occupy new countries but community construction factors may forestall their constitution in the population ( Shurin 2000 ) . Dispersal besides seemingly limits some zooplankton species and they can change in their ability to colonise a new home ground ( Jenkins 1995 ; Jenkins & A ; Buikema 1998 ) Merely two species of zooplankton were found in our pools ab initio and three briefly managed to co-exist which suggest that non merely dispersal limited these animate beings ( Figure 11 ) . Another factor is that the pools were non new when we started to analyze them. It could be that environmental factors like shadiness and deposit and the little differences in physiochemical variables no longer impact the species distribution but that the species composing in the pools may efficaciously halt some species to set up themselves. It is besides possible that since the pools were so close to each other, species were continuously dispersed between pools and that balanced out any major differences between interventions. Speciess that portion the same trophic degree frequently affect each other and this is more of import in longer-lasting home grounds than short passing home grounds where the denseness of rivals are more improbable to be high and where resources might non be depleted as rapidly. One of the rival interactions suggested taking topographic point is that between mosquito-larvae and cladoceran species because both of these may filter feed on phytoplankton. This competition may be particularly of import in pools where the hydroperiod is longer, where there are limited resources or marauder densenesss are non that high ( Blaustein & A ; Chase 2007 ) . The hydroperiod length in our pools is really long compared to more passing pools found in the wider landscape every bit good as the marauder densenesss being low, with Dytiscidae found in low densenesss in merely 4 pools and Chaoborus americanus found in low desnities in merely one pool. One of the possible species pair viing with each other in the pools were Culex pipiens larvae and Anopheles claviger larvae viing with Daphnia Pulex which all provender on phytoplankton. No important correlativity between Daphnia Pulex and the mosquito species were found ( Spearmans Rank Correlation coefficient for Daphnia Pulex and Culex pipiens: Rs ( 14 ) = -0,259, p= & gt ; 0.1 ) , Spearmans rank correlativity coefficient for Daphnia Pulex and Anopheles claviger: Rs ( 14 ) = 0,380, p= 0.1 ) and Daphnia Pulex was well more abundant in our pools which is non an uncommon form ( Blaustein & A ; Chase 2007 ) . A survey by Stav, Blaustein & A ; Margalita ( 2005 ) nevertheless found that the consequence of Daphnia manga on Culex pipiens were that the larvae developed more easy and pupated at a smaller size which so affected the fittingness of the mosquitoes when grownups. This could perchance hold been go oning at our pools every bit good but since we did non take this into history when trying it can non be said for certain.

Figure 11. The three species of zooplankton found in our pools.

The lone species that colonized the pools during the experiment were copepods ( Diaptomus ) , with a first visual aspect in hebdomad 10 of the experiment and at hebdomad 12 it was found in the same four pools as in hebdomad 10. This visual aspect seemed to co-occur with a lowering of Scapholeberis mucronata Numberss as merely a few were found in the samples in hebdomad 10 and none in hebdomad 12. It is possible that competition from Scapholeberis mucronata added with high concentrations of Daphnia Pulex had excluded copepods from pools in old hebdomads. Zooplankton communities in fresh water are frequently dominated by either big or little species. Small species normally dominate in pools with fish since the fish tend to take larger zooplankton whereas fishless H2O is normally dominated by big herbivores and spineless marauders normally take smaller zooplankton ( Brooks & A ; Dodson 1965 ; Dodson 1974 ) . Not many marauders were found in or mesocosms, for illustration one frequently mentioned effectual zooplankton marauder, Chaoborus, was merely present in one pool in low Numberss.

The dominant zooplankton in our pools were Daphnia Pulex and Scapholeberis mucronata Numberss were ever lower, possible because of force per unit area from the competition from Daphnia Pulex. Daphnia Pulex has been found to stamp down smaller species in Numberss by the decrease of nutrient and it is possible it is why smaller zooplankton may hold had trouble to set up themselves in our pools ( Vanni 1986 ) . Diaptomus species have been suggested to be constricted by competition for nutrient, H2O chemical science and predation and low nutrient concentrations have been shown to except Diaptoms from some lakes ( Elore 1983 ) . The competition from both Daphnia Pulex and Scapholeberis mucronata could hold been excessively much for Diaptoms and merely when Scapholeberis mucronata reduced in Numberss was colonisation possible.

Dispersal can go on in three different ways: trough ovipositioning of eggs, trough in-migration and by inactive dispersion ( Shurin 2000 ) . It is likely that the animate beings found in larval phases in the pools have got at that place trough ovipositioning and the grownups are aerial so the scope of dispersion is likely to be big. The grownup signifiers found in the pools were really few and even in the instance of H2O boaters nymphs were found so immigration is most likely less of import than ovipositioning sing these pools. Passive dispersion plays a large function in the happening of microcrustaceans and since these were really abundant, the inactive dispersion likely outweighed the in-migration every bit good. Passive dispersion is non so good understood but air current and rain is likely of import factors every bit good as on occasion thumbing on other animate beings ( Shurin 2000 ; Caeceres & A ; Soluk 2002 ) . Colonization of the pools varied among the different species with some pull offing to colonise all and some merely a few. Jenkins ( 1995 ) found that species colonising multiple pools did so fast ( within a month ) and were found in higher densenesss and for longer whereas species merely found in a few pools were non as dumbly populated and existed for shorter times which is a form similar to our mesocosms. Speciess with low vagility ( capacity to scatter ) were besides found to hold low viability ( capacity to keep in a population ) and the same was true in the opposite way. Jenkins and Buikema ( 1998 ) found that when building 12 semisynthetic pools richness addition for the first 6 to 7 months and that there was no difference in taxa or full communities among pools and that in similarity to our pools, some species were found in all pools and some merely managed to colonise a few. Since these pools already were colonized we do n’t cognize if species like mosquitoes and H2O boaters colonized them quickly although it is possible that they did. The species that were non present in all pools at the start did non colonise more pools during the experiment, proposing that there was something suppressing them from making so, whether it was trouble to scatter or inability to prevail because of the community already established in the pool.

What other factors could hold played in to that there was no difference between interventions? Many other factors have been found to impact species profusion and possibly shadow and deposit are non every bit of import as some other variables in pools. Indeed, both historical, local and regional factors play a function in what communities are found in a pool so abiotic measurings merely contribute to a certain grade ( Stendera et al. 2012 ) Size has non been found to impact all systematic groups, intending that a pool does non hold to be big to back up many species. Oertli et Al. ( 2002 ) found that the lone species groups significantly affected by size were Odonata and Gastropoda, which preferred big pools. This may be due to an indirect consequence since an increased country normally contributes to more habitat diverseness and more diverse vegetation ( Oertli et al. 2002 ; Stendera et al. 2012 ) The pools in the experiment were reasonably little and did non win in pulling any species of the group Odonata and because no deposit sampling was done, Gastropoda was non collected even though they were sometimes seeable from the surface. Oertli ( 2002 ) besides noticed a relationship between shadiness and Odonata profusion so had the pools managed to pull Odonata there might hold been a difference in which ponds they would hold chosen, whereas there was no relationship between shadiness and the other groups examined ( Gastropoda and Coleoptera ) . Other writers have nevertheless found a relationship between pool country and Coleopteran species profusion ( Rundle et al. 2002 ) . Since all of our pools were the same size they might hold attracted some species groups more than others, doing the composing more unvarying. Pond denseness has been found to be one of the biggest forecasters for species profusion: the more pools in a landscape the greater the profusion of invertebrates and workss ( Gledhill, James & A ; Davies 2008 ) . Since all of our pools were situated in close propinquity to each other this once more would hold cancelled out any major difference in species profusion. One of the biggest forecasters of species profusion is the works species profusion found in the pool. Plant species richness have been found to positively impact invertebrate species profusion by the consequence it has in supplying microhabitats, increasing nutrient handiness, supplying safety from marauders every bit good as substrate to construct retreats ( Szalay & A ; Resh 2000 ; Bazzanti, Della Bella & A ; Seminara 2003 ; Gledhill, James & A ; Davies 2008 ) . Ponds with thick emergent flora have been found to hold more diverse communities and particularly Coleopteran species profusion has been found to be influenced by the sum of submersed flora found in a pool ( Oertli et al. 2002 ) . Brady et Al. ( 2002 ) compared mesocosms that had dirt and filtered H2O with mesocosms that had flora nucleuss planted in them and found that a wider scope of invertebrates inhabited those with flora nucleuss. The controls had largely aerial taxa and had much higher denseness of mosquitoes, seize with teething midges and true bugs which was besides found in our mesocosms. Higher denseness of flora has besides been found to take to higher O production in pools ( Gledhill, James & A ; Davies 2008 ) Pond flora being such an of import factor could intend that the same group of insects were attracted to all pools and that many groups were inhibited to colonise them because of the deficiency of flora in the pools.

What does these consequences imply looking at them for a wider angle? Even little pools without flora will pull wildlife so put ining pools in gardens can so lend to the biodiversity of an country. Shadow did non look to impact the colonisation of beings and neither did sediment beds so in all likeliness these will non be the chief factors to see if you want to build a pool that promotes biodiversity. The Countryside Survey 2007 nevertheless found that there was a relationship between increasing tree shadiness and diminishing pool status. This study merely considered workss though and it is possible that if we had workss in the pools these would hold been affected by the shadiness and in bend affected the species so more research with more variables would be good to increase the cognition in this country. Past consequences have shown flora to be of import and turn outing to pull invertebrates so put ining workss in a pool will probably profit biodiversity. Connectivity of pools in the wider landscape is besides an of import factor, since the connectivity is critical for biodiversity and community construction ( Stendera et al. 2012 ) , so it is of import to acquire as many people as possible educated on urbanization and biodiversity because isolation negatively affects biodiversity. Hopefully as more and more people realize how of import pools can be, more research and general cognition will roll up and some of this cognition can be used to off-set the impacts of urbanization and clime alteration in the hereafter.

5063

Mentions

Alberti, M.A. , Allan, E. , Allard, S. , Bauer, D.J. , Beagen, W. , Bradt, S.R. , Carlson, B. , Carlson, S.C. , Doan, U.M. , Dufresne, J. , Godkin, T.W. , Greene, S. , Haney, J.F. , Kaplan, A. , Maroni, E. , Melillo, S. , Murby, L.A. , Smith, J.L. , Ortman, B. , Quist, J.E. , Reed, S. , Rowin, T. , Schmuck, M. & A ; Stemberger, R.S. ( 2010 ) An image-based key to the zooplankton of the Northeast, USA, version 4.0. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //cfb.unh.edu/CFBKey/html/index.html [ 7.3.2013 ]

Araoye, P.A. ( 2009 ) The seasonal fluctuation of pH and dissolved O ( DO2 ) concentration in Asa lake Ilorin, Nigeria. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 4, 271-274.

Bazzanti, M. , Della Bella, V. & A ; Seminara, M. ( 2003 ) Factors impacting macroinvertebrate communities in astatic pools in Central Italy. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 18, 537-548.

Berezina, N.A. ( 2001 ) Influence of ambient pH on fresh water invertebrates under experimental conditions. Russian Journal of Ecology, 32, 343-351.

Biggs, J. , Fox, G. , Nicolet, P. , Whitfield, M. & A ; Williams, P. ( 2001 ) Dangers and chances in pull offing impermanent pools. Freshwater Forum, 17, 71-80.

Biggs, J. , Williams, P. , Whitfield, M. , Nicolet, P. & A ; Weatherby, A. ( 2005 ) 15 old ages of pool appraisal in Britain: consequences and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 15, 693-714.

Blaustein, L. & A ; Chase, J.M. ( 2007 ) Interactions between mosquito larvae and species that portion the same trophic degree. Entomology, 52, 489-507.

Boothby, J. ( 1995 ) Prolonging a threatened landscape: Farmland ponds in Cheshire. Journal of Environmental Planning and Managment, 38, 561-568.

Brady, V.J. , Cardinale, B.J. , Gathman, J.P. & A ; Burton, T.M. ( 2002 ) Does facilitation of faunal enlisting benefit ecosystem Restoration? An experimental survey of invertebrate gatherings in wetland mesocosms. Restoration Ecology, 10, 617-626.

Brooks, J.L. & A ; Dodson, S.I. ( 1965 ) Depredation, Body Size and Composition of Plankton. Science, 150, 28-35.

Bronmark, C. & A ; Hansson, L.A. ( 2002 ) Environmental issues in lakes and pools: current province and positions. Environmental Conservation, 29, 290-360.

Caeceres, C.E. & A ; Soluk, D.A. ( 2002 ) Blowing in the air current: a field trial of overland dispersion and colonisation by aquatic invertebrates. Population Ecology, 131, 402-408.

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. ( 1999 ) Canadian H2O quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Dissolved O ( fresh water ) . Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg.

Cottenie, K. , Michels, E. , Nuytten, N. & A ; De meester, L. ( 2003 ) Zooplankton metacommunity construction: Regional vs. Local procedures in extremely interrelated pools. Ecology, 84, 991-1000.

Cranston, P.S. , Ramsdale, C.D. , Snow, K.R. & A ; White, G.B. ( 1987 ) Keys to the grownups, male hypogia, 4th instar larvae and pupae of the British mosquitoes ( Culicidae ) with notes on their ecology and medical importance. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria

Croft, P.S. ( 1986 ) A key to the major groups of British fresh water invertebrates. Henry Ling Ltd. , Dorset.

Davies, Z.G. , Fuller, R.A. , Loram, A. , Irvine, K.N. , Sims, V. & A ; Gaston, K.J. ( 2009 ) A national graduated table stock list of resource proviso for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biological Conservation, 142, 761-771.

Disney, M.A. ( 1975 ) A key to the larvae, pupae and grownups of the British Dixidae ( Diptera ) . Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria.

Dodson, S.I. ( 1974 ) Zooplankton competition and predation: An experimental trial on the size-efficiency hypothesis. Ecology, 55, 605-613.

Dudgeon, D. , Arthington, A.H. , Gessner, M.O. , Kawabata, Z.I. , Knowler, D.J. , Leveque, C. , Naiman, R.J. , Prieur-Richard, A.H. , Soto, D. , Stiassny, M.L.J. & A ; Sullivan, C.A. ( 2006 ) Freshwater Biodiversity: importance, menaces, position and preservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163-182.

Elliot, J.M. , Humpesch, U.H. & A ; Macan, T.T. ( 1988 ) Larvae of the British Ephemerida: a key with ecological functions. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria.

Elmore, J.L. ( 1983 ) Factors impacting Diaptomus distributions: An experimental survey in semitropical Florida. Limnology and Oceanography, 28, 522-533.

Frisch, D. & A ; Green, A.J. ( 2007 ) Copepods come in first: rapid colonisation of new impermanent pools. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 168, 289-297.

Gaston, K.J. , Smith, R.M. , Thompson, K. & A ; Warren, P.H. ( 2005a ) Urban Domestic gardens ( II ) : Experimental trials of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 395-413.

Gaston, K.J. , Warren, P.H. , Thompson, K. & A ; Smith, R.M. ( 2005b ) Urban domestic gardens ( IV ) : the extent of the resource and its associated characteristics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 3327-3349.

Gledhill, D.G. , James, P. & A ; Davies, D.H. ( 2008 ) Pond denseness as a determiner of aquatic species profusion in an urban landscape. Landscape Ecology, 23, 1219-1230.

Goddard, M.A. , Dougill, A.J. & A ; Benton, T.G. ( 2010 ) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity preservation in an urban country. Tendencies in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 90-98.

Greenhalgh, M. & A ; Ovenden, D. ( 2007 ) Freshwater Life – Britain and Northern Europe. HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. , London.

Henderson, P.A. ( 1990 ) Freshwater Ostracods: keys and notes for the designation of species. Universal Book Services, Oegstgeest.

Jenkins, D.G. ( 1995 ) Dispersal-limited zooplankton distribution and community composing in new pools. Hydrobiologia, 313, 15-20.

Jenkins, D.G. & A ; Buikema, A.L. ( 1998 ) Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A trial with Zooplankton construction and map. Ecological Monographs, 68, 421-443.

Jenway ( 2010 ) The consequence of temperature on conduction measurings. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.jenway.com/adminimages/A02_001A_Effect_of_temperature_on_conductivity.pdf [ 8.3.2013 ]

Lock, K. & A ; Goethals, P.L.M. ( 2011 ) Distribution and ecology of the dayflies ( Ephemeroptera ) of Flanders ( Belgium ) . International Journal of Limnology, 47, 159-165.

Loram, A. , Tratalos, J. , Warren, P.H. & A ; Gaston, K.J. ( 2007 ) Urban Domestic Gardens ( X ) : the extent & A ; construction of the resource in five major metropoliss. Landscape Ecology, 22, 601-615.

Macan, T.T. ( 1962 ) A revised key to the British H2O bugs ( Hemiptera-Heteroptera ) . 2nd erectile dysfunction. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria.

National Research Council ( U.S. ) . Committee on Water Quality Criteria ( 1972 ) Water quality standards, 1972: a study of the Committee on Water Quality Criteria, Environmental Studies Board, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Oertli, B. , Joye, D.A. , Castella, E. , Juge, R. , Cambin, D. & A ; Lachavanne, J. ( 2002 ) Does size affair? The relationship between pool country and biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 104, 59-70.

Oertli, B. , Biggs, J. , Cereghino, R. , Grillas, P. , Joly, P. & A ; Lachavanne, J. ( 2005 ) Conservation and monitoring of pool biodiversity: debut. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater ecosystems, 15, 535-540.

Pond Conservation ( 2013 ) What is the definition of a pool? Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.pondconservation.org.uk/advice/definitionofapond [ 1.2.2013 ]

Rundle, S.D. , Foggo, A. , Choiseul, V. & A ; Bilton, T. ( 2002 ) Are distribution forms linked to dispersal mechanism? An probe utilizing pool invertebrate gatherings. Freshwater Biology, 47, 1571-1581.

Schwarts, M. ( 2006 ) Encyclopedia of coastal scientific discipline. Springer, Netherlands.

Scourfield, D.J. & A ; Harding, J.P. ( 1966 ) A key to the British species of fresh water Cladocera. 3rd erectile dysfunction. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria.

Shurin, J.B. ( 2000 ) Dispersal restriction, invasion opposition and the construction of zooplankton communities. Ecology, 81, 3074-3086.

Smith, K.G.V. ( 1989 ) An debut to the immature phases of the British flies. Henry Ling Ltd. , Dorset.

Stav, G. , Blaustein, L. & A ; Margalit, Y. ( 2005 ) Individual and synergistic effects of a marauder and controphic species on mosquito populations. Ecological Applications, 15, 587-589.

Stendera, S. , Adrian, R. , Bonada, N. , Canedo-Arguelles, M. , Hugueny, B. , Janusche, K. , Pletterbauer, F. & A ; Hering, D. ( 2012 ) Drivers and stressors of fresh water biodiversity patterns across different ecosystems and graduated tables: a reappraisal. Hydrobiologia, 696, 1-28.

Szalay, F.A. & A ; Resh, V.H. ( 2000 ) Factors act uponing macroinvertebrate colonisation of seasonal wetlands: responses to emergent works screen. Freshwater biological science, 45, 295-308.

Tratalos, J. , Fuller, R.A. , Warren, P.H. , Davies, R.G. & A ; Gaston, K.J. ( 2007 ) Urban signifier, biodiversity potency and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 308-317.

UNFPA ( 2007 ) State of the universe population 2007. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2007/695_filename_sowp2007_eng.pdf [ 4.2.2013 ]

UK National Ecosystem Assessment ( 2011 ) The UK National Ecosystem Assesment: Synthesis of Key Findings. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/natural/documents/UKNEA_SynthesisReport.pdf [ 4.2.2013 ]

Vanni, M.J. ( 1986 ) Competition in zooplankton communities: Suppression of little species by Daphnia Pulex. Limnology and Oceanography, 31, 1039-1056.

Williams, P. , Biggs, J. , Crowe, A. , Murphy, J. , Nicolet, P. , Weatherby, A. & A ; Dunbar, A. ( 2010 ) Countryside Survey: Ponds Report from 2007. Technical Report No. 7/07 Pond Conservation and NERC/Centre for Ecology & A ; Hydrology, 77pp. ( CEH Project Number: C03259 )

Wood P.J. , Greenwod, M.T. & A ; Agnew, M.D. ( 2003 ) Pond biodiversity and habitat loss in the UK. Area, 35, 206-216.

APPENDIX 1

Physiochemical sampling informations

Week 1

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

9,22

12,6

5,1

248

B1

8,66

12,6

4,1

236

C1

9,04

13,4

4,5

257

D1

8,75

12,6

4,6

197

A2

8,38

13,0

3,6

267

B2

8,66

12,9

4,4

235

C2

8,87

13,2

2,6

275

D2

8,43

12,7

3,1

253

A3

9,66

13,8

6,9

264

B3

8,58

12,9

3,8

237

C3

8,71

13,2

6,8

233

D3

8,92

12,7

5,5

201

A4

8,55

13,7

4

252

B4

8,55

12,8

2,6

320

C4

8,47

13,4

4

307

D4

8,54

12,7

4

230

Week 2

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

9,2

11,6

5,6

210

B1

8,6

11,6

3,5

162

C1

8,6

12

4,2

212

D1

7,95

11,7

5

192

A2

7,97

12,1

4,2

237

B2

8,9

11,8

4,6

204

C2

7,91

12,2

4

233

D2

8,7

11,8

2,1

231

A3

8,7

12,4

4,9

235

B3

8,5

11,9

4

208

C3

8,4

12,1

5,5

188

D3

8,85

11,9

4,8

176

A4

8,4

11,9

4,7

247

B4

8,8

12,4

2,8

272

C4

8,3

12,3

3,3

272

D4

8,34

12,1

4,8

209

Week 3

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

9,63

10,3

6,3

194

B1

8,93

9,8

4,9

205

C1

9,28

10,2

5,6

214

D1

8,97

9,8

5,7

189

A2

8,72

10,5

4,6

227

B2

8,98

9,7

6,2

199

C2

7,95

10,4

4,5

222

D2

8,73

10

3,4

228

A3

8,22

11,4

6,1

226

B3

7,76

9,8

5,1

198

C3

8,34

10,7

6,3

179

D3

9,01

9,7

6,7

169

A4

8,31

11

4,7

234

B4

8,56

9,9

4

260

C4

8,09

11,1

4,5

257

D4

8,4

10,1

5,8

198

Week 4

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

10,24

13,4

6

178

B1

9,24

13,4

3,9

196

C1

9,95

13,5

5,1

193

D1

9,59

13,4

4,5

126

A2

8,94

13,5

2

219

B2

10,34

13,5

5,2

175

C2

9,41

13,5

2

212

D2

9,37

13,5

1,1

208

A3

9,73

13,7

4,1

208

B3

9,6

13,6

2,4

191

C3

9,32

13,7

3,9

171

D3

9,93

13,6

5,4

161

A4

9,32

13,7

1,6

225

B4

9,31

13,6

2,1

246

C4

9,41

13,6

1,5

257

D4

9,28

13,6

2

193

Week 5

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

11,83

8,3

6,5

186

B1

11,13

8

5,2

205

C1

11,89

8,9

6

199

D1

11,33

8,2

5,7

184

A2

11,55

9,2

6,7

221

B2

11,88

8,1

5,9

190

C2

11,42

9,1

5,4

222

D2

11,59

8,6

4,7

222

A3

11,44

10,4

7,4

215

B3

11,51

8,2

5,4

193

C3

11,64

8,6

6,7

170

D3

11,68

8

6,7

165

A4

11,68

9,1

4,5

235

B4

11,45

8,2

4,2

251

C4

11,54

9,4

5,4

254

D4

11,42

8,2

5,4

197

Week 6

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

11,31

4,3

9,3

152

B1

10,71

2,4

6,8

170

C1

12,17

4

6,5

173

D1

11,76

2,2

8,2

152

A2

10,06

4,9

4,7

192

B2

12,47

3,5

7,1

153

C2

11,13

4,6

6,6

163

D2

11,31

3,9

5,2

190

A3

11,5

5,3

7

188

B3

12,07

4,2

6,2

164

C3

12,05

4,7

7,7

141

D3

12,26

4

7,4

142

A4

12,07

5,6

6,6

197

B4

10,99

4,6

6,3

218

C4

11,96

5,8

5,8

218

D4

11,93

4,6

6,6

167

Week 7

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

10,56

8,6

3

146

B1

9,84

8,8

3,2

181

C1

10,50

8,9

2,6

178

D1

10,67

8,7

2,9

161

A2

10,17

8,9

2,6

197

B2

10,98

9

2

171

C2

9,93

8,8

2,7

198

D2

10,01

8,9

3,1

199

A3

10,70

9,9

1,7

149

B3

10,35

8,9

1,8

174

C3

10,28

9

1,9

148

D3

11,05

9,7

2,2

148

A4

10,18

9

1

209

B4

10,18

9,4

1,4

243

C4

10,21

8,7

1,5

229

D4

10,30

9,6

1,3

174

Week 8

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

11,1

9,9

1,3

170

B1

10,32

9,6

1,3

183

C1

10,25

10,5

1,1

175

D1

10,35

10,3

1

163

A2

9,87

10,2

0,9

195

B2

10,08

10,4

0,8

173

C2

9,62

9,7

0,7

202

D2

9,34

9,8

0,9

202

A3

9,63

9,6

0,7

206

B3

9,83

9,9

0,9

175

C3

9,34

9,7

0,6

152

D3

10,22

10,3

0,9

156

A4

9,21

10

0,4

210

B4

9,42

10,3

1,4

233

C4

9,24

10,2

0,9

230

D4

9,39

10,5

0,4

179

Week 9

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

10,22

7,7

0,6

160

B1

10,22

8,1

0,4

175

C1

10,02

8,2

0,4

174

D1

10,38

8,1

0,5

159

A2

10,04

8,2

0,5

186

B2

10,26

8,2

0,6

165

C2

9,16

8,2

0,6

187

D2

10,27

8,2

0,4

180

A3

9,95

8,6

2,1

180

B3

9,43

8,4

2,0

162

C3

10,11

8,2

2,0

148

D3

9,89

8,2

2,0

147

A4

9,96

8,5

1,7

196

B4

9,78

12,1

4,4

212

C4

9,73

8,6

3,3

214

D4

9,44

8,6

1,8

167

Week 10

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

*

3,1

0,2

153

B1

*

3,1

0

133

C1

*

3,4

0,7

152

D1

*

2,4

0,3

141

A2

*

5,1

1,1

173

B2

*

3,3

1,2

158

C2

*

3,9

1,2

184

D2

*

5,6

1,1

142

A3

*

3,7

0,9

172

B3

*

4,1

0,9

156

C3

*

3,9

0,9

136

D3

*

2,8

1

142

A4

*

3,3

0,8

153

B4

*

3,3

1

213

C4

*

4,1

0,9

186

D4

*

4,1

0,7

164

Week 11

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

A *

1

2,1

159

B1

A *

3

2,1

161

C1

A *

6,1

2,3

162

D1

A *

2,4

2,3

136

A2

A *

2,1

2

191

B2

A *

2,5

2,1

169

C2

A *

2,9

2,2

199

D2

A *

3,1

2,2

174

A3

A *

3,2

1,7

206

B3

A *

2,2

1,8

119

C3

A *

2,9

2

145

D3

A *

2

1,8

141

A4

A *

1,9

1,1

140

B4

A *

2,8

1,3

224

C4

A *

2,1

1,1

162

D4

A *

2,8

1

125

Week 12

pH

Temperature

Dissolved O2

Conduction

A1

*

5,5

8,1

156

B1

*

5,8

10,8

162

C1

*

5,4

14,6

171

D1

*

5,8

11,6

149

A2

*

5,6

16,1

137

B2

*

5,1

15,2

127

C2

*

5,8

13,8

200

D2

*

5,3

15,8

131

A3

*

6,1

12,1

144

B3

*

5,2

15,1

145

C3

*

5,8

13,7

178

D3

*

6,2

15,5

161

A4

*

6,8

14,9

162

B4

*

5,5

14,2

135

C4

*

5,9

14,8

172

D4

*

6

15,9

168

APPENDIX 2

Turbidity values for A3

Week

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Turbidity ( centimeter )

0

7,5

10

6

10,5

10,5

13

18

10

8

20

15