Romeo And Juliet Shakespeare Essay

Romeo And Juliet: Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s Metaphor Of Comparing Man To Plants Essay, Research Paper

Romeo and Juliet: Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s Metaphor Of Comparing Man To Plants

To show his position of good and evil in every adult male, William Shakespeare

writes lines that Friar Laurence reveals in the calamity of Romeo and Juliet

which compare adult male to workss, concentrating on the common trait they hold of holding

two contrasting constituents in their being. Throughout history, there has ever

been a struggle with the position of goodness and evilness in adult male. The philosopher

Plato believed that adult male was born with a natural corruption and was fundamentally an

untrained animate being who needed society & # 8217 ; s aid to construction, educate, and carry through

his demands. On the other manus, Plato & # 8217 ; s pupil Aristotle believed that adult male is

ab initio born with goodness and virtuousness. The issue of adult male & # 8217 ; s two sides can be

exhaustively discussed over the Gothic novel of Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.

Some critics believe that the? animal? was prone to evil from the oncoming, that

it was innately in his being, while others argue that the intervention the?

animal? received from worlds pitted him against world into an immorality and

vindictive province. Shakespeare, nevertheless, in his drawn-out metaphor comparing adult male

to workss, holds the sentiment that there is both decency and opprobrium in adult male. His

sentiment can be compared to the narrative of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis

Stevenson, where Dr. Jekyll is innately pure and sort but because he tries to

conceal the malicious side of his being, it finally overcomes him wholly.

Shakspere wants to turn to the thought that evil can destruct a individual and

catch them if it is let in and uses his lines of Friar Laurence as an

apothegm and a warning to mankind.

The undermentioned lines from Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s Romeo and Juliet to the full portray

the writer & # 8217 ; s position of a split of artlessness and corruptness in adult male, and the idea

that immorality is likely and able to destruct adult male from the interior out.

Within the infant rind of this little flower

Poison hath abode and medical specialty power.

In adult male every bit good as herbs, grace and rude will ;

And where the worser is pred


Full shortly the canker decease eats up that works.

Translated, these lines can be interpreted as follows:

Within the bud of this little flower

Poison lives and medical specialty has possible power.

In adult male, like in workss, there is both good and evil constituents,

And if the immorality is stronger and more prevalent,

It is certain the works will be destroyed.

In the first line, Shakespeare speaks of a new works, which alludes to a human

babe or a kid. This is the beginning of his drawn-out metaphor measuring

workss to adult male. Just like a works can hold malevolent toxicant or good

medical specialty, adult male besides has an ailment and humanist side to him. Depending on the class a

adult male takes throughout his life, that immorality may catch and devour him, merely as

the constituents of a works can be fatal depending on how they are used. With

this thought, Shakespeare gives us the apothegm that if adult male does non seek to command

the sum of immorality in his life, he will stop up being the tragic hero of these

really lines. Through the look of the words and with the usage of drawn-out

metaphor, Shakespeare compares adult male to workss and portrays the cardinal subject that

there is both virtuousness and frailty in adult male, but if the frailty is of a greater quality,

it can be the fatal defect taking to the ruin of adult male.

Shakspere intimations to his audience the life lesson that one should ne’er

allow evil be the prevailing trait in their character because it will finally

eat them like a malignant neoplastic disease from the interior out. By comparing adult male to workss, he

emphasizes the thought that every adult male has a double personality keeping both good and

immorality, in the same mode that workss hold medical specialty and toxicant within their buds.

With the usage of drawn-out metaphor, Shakespeare holds the thought throughout that

adult male can be looked at in a similar position to adult male because they portion this

feature of dichotomy. The apothegm to be shared with his audience is

Shakespeare & # 8217 ; s foreboding of allowing excessively much immoralities overtake the good in one & # 8217 ; s

personality because it has the possible to destruct, merely as evil took the life

of Dr. Jekyll who could non avoid it taking over his being.