Romeo And Juliet Various Types Of Love Essay

Romeo And Juliet: Assorted Types Of Love Essay, Research Paper

Throughout the calamity of Romeo and Juliet assorted types of & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; are

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

displayed. Benvolio believes adult females are interchangeable, while, at the

get downing Romeo Bel ieves love is hurting. At the get downing Juliet does non

even have a definition of love. Paris & # 8217 ; s and Lady Capulet & # 8217 ; s definition of

love is in visual aspect. It is obvio us that Shakespeare wants the audience

to believe that the lone & # 8220 ; true & # 8221 ; or & # 8220 ; existent & # 8221 ; love is the love that exists

between Romeo and Juliet. The first type of love the audience is introduced

to is the & # 8220 ; interchangeable & # 8221 ; lo ve of Benvolio. Harmonizing to Benvolio, a adult male

should & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; a adult female for merely the continuance of their relationship. If their

relationship should stop, the adult male should experience no heartache. If the adult female culls

the adult male ab initio, he should still experience no heartache. In either state of affairs, the

adult male should merely get down a relationship with anot her adult female. Benvolio & # 8217 ; s

definition of love shows the audience two things about Ben volio: he is a

womaniser and he has ne’er earlier experient & # 8220 ; true love. & # 8221 ; The following

definition of love comes from Romeo, but before the clip he met Juliet.

Harmonizing to his definition, love ( or, instead, non returned love ) is pain.

He h ides from the Sun due to the & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; he feels, and does non move like

& # 8220 ; himself. & # 8221 ; I believe Romeo is both right and incorrect: non returned love is

hurting, but Romeo doe s non genuinely love, as he is simply infatuated by a

adult female. The following definition of love comes from Juliet, who, before meeting

Romeo, did no T even have a definition of love. She appears non to cognize

what love is, and, for that affair, does non look to care. She remains

ignorant until she meets Romeo.

Another type of & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; we are exposed to during the same scene is the love of Lady

Capulet. Lady Capulet believes love comes from visual aspect, both physical and

political, and has nil to make with emotion. She shows this when she speaks

favourably of Paris & # 8217 ; s looks and his aristocracy. She besides shows that she does non love

Capulet when she publically denounces him. The Nurse & # 8217 ; s sentiment of love coincides

with that of Lady Capulet.

Paris has a similar position of love. His & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; for Juliet appears to be pure, but

his ground does non. He loves Juliet for her visual aspect and nil else. He

P >

respects her more as belongings than as an person. He is besides selfish in his & # 8220 ; love. & # 8221 ;

When he believes Juliet is dead ( in Act IV ) he seems sorrier for his ain loss

than Juliet & # 8217 ; s evident loss. He & # 8220 ; loves & # 8221 ; Juliet every bit much as he can love anyone, but

his love can non be considered & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ; because of his selfishness.

Finally, in Act II, the audience sees what is defined as & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ; in our society.

This & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; is the love that grows between Romeo and Juliet. The definition

of & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ; Shakespeare provides the audience with provinces that all the other

characters & # 8217 ; definitions of love are incorrect. It besides states that when two people

are in true love, there is no hurting unless they are for good separated. It

shows that lovers are non interchangeable, and that love transcends visual aspect.

It proves all except one other & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; in the drama incorrect. It besides shows that existent

love is non affected by distance or convenience. When two people are in & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ;

they are non selfish to one another, do non care about visual aspects, and can non

live without one another. I agree with this definition of love ( all except that

without one another the lovers can non last ) .

Romeo and Juliet & # 8217 ; s love for one another besides goes beyond one other thing: names.

It shows that names do non count. In our society the difference in names would

be equal to two people of different races. The people would come from racialist

households in a modern twenty-four hours remaking of the drama.

The last illustration of love in the drama is parental love. This is shown in Act V

scene three. Lady Montague dies due to separation from her boy. Capulet, Montague,

Lady Capulet, and even the Nurse shows that they love either Romeo or Juliet in T

his manner.

In the calamity of Romeo and Juliet many types of love are shown. None of them

are incorrect, as the word & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; is capable to reading, but it is obvious that

Shakspere did non hold this in head when he wrote the drama. Shakspere shows

us that the lone type of love worth being in is & # 8220 ; true love. & # 8221 ; He besides shows us

that, with all types of love, there is hurting. If his end was to act upon the

audience to believe that the lone existent love is the type of love that existed

between Romeo and Juliet, I believe he accomplished it.

Bibliography

Shakespear, Romeo & A ; Juliet