Steroids Essay Research Paper The PerformanceEnhancing Supplement

Steroids Essay, Research Paper

The Performance-Enhancing Supplement Controversy

The usage of performance-enhancing addendums among jocks should be banned

from all athletic athleticss and competition, in that it provides an unjust

advantage over other jocks seeking to stand out of course. Performance-enhancing

drugs are a controversial subject in today? s society, which are presently under

argument.

Performance-enhancing drugs are substances, which are used to excite

certain countries of the organic structure to do an athlete excel in a certain event. A

public presentation heightening addendum is defined by Edward Dolan in his book Drugs

and Sports as? any substance or method used to heighten athletic public presentation? .

The most common signifier of performance-enhancing addendums are called steroids.

Harmonizing to Hank Nuwer in his book Steroids, steroids are anabolic drugs that

construct growing endocrines that include the androgens ( male sex endocrines ) chiefly

testosterone and estrogen and progestins ( female sex endocrines ) . Steroids were

foremost developed for medical intents. Steroids are compounds that are necessary

for the well being of many life animals, including human existences. These

include sex endocrines, bile acids, and cholesterin ( Nuwer 17 ) . Steroids are used

in the medical field to handle many complaints, and this usage is non the usage, which

is presently under contention. As steroids entered the mainstream after their

historic debut in the 1930? s to assist patients undernourish due to the

war and disease, they evolved into something understood by more than the

prime-time college or Olympic-bound jock as John Papanke studies in Sports

Illustrated. The medical utilizations of steroids are to handle anaemia, asthma, anorexia,

Burnss, enteric upsets, and much more ( Nuwer 15 ) . These types of steroids

are called cortical steroids.

In add-on to the medical usage, another intent of steroids and

performance-enhancing drugs are that they are used by jocks to derive an unjust

advantage over their rivals, or utilize them to maintain up with the competition

since so many jocks are utilizing these types of drugs. These coveted effects

scope from increasing musculus size and strength, to diminishing weariness, supplying

speedy impermanent weight addition, suppressing growing, and even simple hurting alleviation ( Lupica

24 ) . Performance-enhancing drugs are taken in a assortment of different ways. The

two most common ways these drugs are taken, are orally in a pill signifier, or

injected into the organic structure with a acerate leaf. The most common sort of

performance-enhancing drugs are Nelvar, Deca-Durabolin, Anavar, Stanzolol,

Dianabol and Anadrol-50 ( Nuwer 19 ) . These drugs are much more unsafe so

legal public presentation heightening drugs because the jocks take more than the

recommended doses that would be prescribed by a physician. Athletes feel that the

more pills or injections they take the stronger, faster, and the better they

will execute when viing, but this is non ever true.

The effects of steroids on the human organic structure are good recorded, they could

for good damage the bosom and liver, stunt growing and alteration sexual

features ( Green 81 ) . Performance-enhancing drugs and steroids have been

proven to be harmful to 1s wellness harmonizing to many surveies. These surveies

hold shown that steroids have been a major factor in doing liver harm,

myocardiopathy ( the have oning out of the bosom ) , icterus, purpura hepatis ( blood

filled cysts that form in the liver ) , and inauspicious affects on both the

cardiovascular system and on the generative system ( Meer 97 ) other side

affects which are shared by both sexes which include high blood force per unit area, H2O

keeping, depression, cholesterin jobs, infected daze, diarrhoea, uninterrupted

bad breath, bosom disease, yellowing of the eyes or tegument ( due to liver

jobs ) , insomnia, foetal harm for pregnant adult females, aggressive behaviour, and

of class, decease ( Bamberger 61 ) . Yet, adult females and work forces are still willing to put on the line

their wellness and their lives in order to win and remain competitory in the universe

of athleticss. These merchandises have besides been linked to doing some signifiers of malignant neoplastic disease.

Due to these jeopardies, many performance-enhancing drugs have been banned in

certain national and international athleticss, such as the NFL, NBA, ABA, WNBA, CFL,

AFL and the Olympics ( 61 ) . Although these performance-enhancing addendums are

banned, this does non intend that athletes take parting in these athleticss do non

take them, nevertheless. Professional athletic athleticss are a major country in which

performance-enhancing drugs are used. Although some people use them merely to seek

to do themselves look bigger and better, most people use them to assist maintain up

with the competition in athletic events. The usage of performance-enhancing

addendums and drugs gives the user an unjust advantage over their competition

through accomplishing strength in a shorter sum of clip. The chief intent of

performance-enhancing addendums is to acquire bigger and better faster.

Unfortunately, it is non merely the major jocks in pro athleticss and in the

Olympic gamess who use these drugs.

Performance-enhancing drugs are used in all degrees of competition today,

whether it is in the Olympics, in pro athleticss, in colleges, or even in high

schools. In our society today we have seen an addition in the sum of high

school jocks utilizing performance-enhancing addendums for the exclusive intent of

accomplishing triumph. ? Steroids usage permeates at all degrees of athleticss,

endangering the hereafters of 100s of 1000s of adolescents? ( Blair 17 ) . The

issue refering teens and performance-enhancing drugs is a quickly turning one.

Harmonizing to Nuwer in his book Steroids, about 66 % of male high school seniors

have used anabolic steroids at least one point during their short lives so far

( 65 ) . Besides, Nuwer says that & # 8230 ; medical research workers believe that between one and

three million young persons and grownups have taken anabolic steroids in one signifier or

another specifically to heighten their expressions or athletic public presentations ( 61 ) .

Athletes hear about professional jocks utilizing the drugs and they see the

difference it makes, but what they don & # 8217 ; t know or don & # 8217 ; t care about are the

long-run effects. The effects on adolescents are similar to the effects on

grownups. If a adolescent starts out utilizing at a immature age and invariably uses these

addendums, the long term side affects are more likely to be life endangering.

Over eight per centum of high bookmans use anabolic steroids ( Goldwire ) . Medical

research workers believe that between one and three million young persons and grownups have

taken anabolic steroids in one signifier or another specifically to heighten their

physical visual aspect ( Day 45 ) . Another big portion of the usage of public presentation

heightening drugs is in colleges. College jocks take a large hazard in utilizing these

types of drugs because they can endanger the scholarships that they have

worked so difficult to gain. When other jocks use public presentation heightening drugs they

can sometimes coerce a teammate to utilize. Most of the clip, the jocks on the

squad administer the drugs so that it can better the squad. A survey found that

70 per centum of users got their drugs from the black market as their drug

beginning ( Wright 52 ) . Athletes see other people taking these drugs who are

stand outing in events, interrupting records, and bulking up and they feel in order to

compete at the following degree they must make the same. Besides, many jocks are

misinformed about the dangers of performance-enhancing addendums, but on the

other manus many jocks are cognizant of the dangers and effects of taking

these foils. In professional athleticss it is really likely to see public presentation

heightening addendums while jocks are in the preparation phases before their

season begins. ? Performance-enhancing drugs in athleticss has been known for

coevalss, the users have by and large constituted a little minority of jocks?

( Nardo 24 ) .

The Olympics have been long known for holding jocks take steroids. For

old ages now, certain states such as the former Country of East Germany and the

former U.S.S.R. , every bit good as China, have had a figure of jocks who have taken

performance-enhancing addendums taking up to and during Olympic competition.

Bob Costas studies in a recent Sports Illustrated:

They? re edifice into a power, but amidst intuitions? particularly

refering their path jocks, female swimmers, and in the weight lifting

sphere entirely, Chinese adult females eclipsed every universe record in all nine-weight

categories, perchance utilizing performance-enhancing drugs ( 18 ) .

Presently there is an probe affecting managers and jocks from

Germany who competed in the 1976 Olympics. As Don Kardong studies in Smugglers

Universe: A German research worker is seeking for grounds for a condemnable test of

four managers and two physicians accused of giving steroids and other

performance-enhancing drugs to unsuspecting jocks ( 72 ) . For old ages jocks in

the Olympics have been utilizing performance-enhancing addendums that have been

banned from competition, some have non been caught but others haven? t been so

lucky. Ben Johnson was an Olympic smuggler who represented Canada. In 1988 he was

disqualified from the Olympics after winning the gold decoration in the 100-meter

elan because he tested positive for steroids. Ben Johnson was banned from the

Olympic gamess and his great calling and repute was ruined. In an article by

Michael Janofsky for the New York Times stated that medical and legal experts as

good as drug sellers estimated that at least half of the nine 1000

jocks who compete in the Olympics have used steroids ( Nardo 17 ) .

In the past three decennaries, steroids have been going a serious job more

than of all time in the athletic field. ? The usage of drugs by jocks has become a

major job: Not that drug maltreatment is anything new in athleticss, it has merely picked

up new impulse? ( Reilly 41 ) . They & # 8217 ; rhenium used in commanding redness,

beef uping weakened Black Marias, forestalling construct, and relieving symptoms

of arthritis and asthma ( Cowart 33 ) . Unfortunately research has shown that

steroids have been abused in about every sort of athletics. Although steroids

contribute to a muscular organic structure, use should stay illegal because they

physically deteriorate and mentally destruct the organic structure. ? Research workers have

noticed alterations in encephalon moving ridge activity in steroid users? ( Nardo 24 ) .

Many people are fascinated about steroids because of their ability to construct

up the organic structure. Whether taken by injection or the pill it increases strength and

endurance. ? Yes Steroids do take to the addition of musculus mass, but they besides

lead to serious jobs in the long tally? ( Alvin 64 ) . Steroids besides help in

the mending procedure of muscular tissue by first wounding them, so the musculuss

heal quicker adding more fiber increasing their majority ( Edelson 138 ) . Steroids are

besides really hard to follow because of their H2O base composing. They can go through

through the organic structure within two yearss ( 140 ) . All these benefits of steroids aid

athletes become more competitory and increase their opportunity of going a victor.

Of class everybody wants better biceps and triceps but when utilizing steroids to

accomplish this end there is a big monetary value to pay.

Steroids should stay illegal because they physically deteriorate the whole

organic structure system. In adult females steroids contribute to the growing of facial hair,

expansions of the button, shrinking of the womb, asepsis, deepening of

the voice, lessening in chest size and abnormality of the catamenial rhythm ( Meer

61 ) . In work forces steroids cause shrinking of the testiss, lessening in sperm count,

asepsis, powerlessness, prostate expansion and growing of female chest. In both

work forces and adult females hair loss, liver complaints, acne, atherosierosis and malignant neoplastic disease are

really common ( 61 ) . The side effects and reactions from the use of anabolic

steroids are eternal.

Along with the physical jobs there are besides mental reactions associated

with the use of steroids. This drug becomes really habit-forming and damaging to the

head. It causes violent episodes, which an jock can claim, a legal insanity

defence as Jonathan Harris studies in his book Drugged Athletes. Research has

besides discovered that steroids cause psychotic side effects sometimes referred to

as “ roid fury ” . Along with these are wild aggressive, contentious

behaviour, depression, languor and psychotic beliefs during and after public presentation.

Steroids mentally destroy the encephalon and ability to ground ( 139 ) . Overall the

use of steroids is really detrimental to the human organic structure. Even though it physically

physiques up the organic structure for better public presentation the hazards of use are tremendous.

Steroids physically deteriorate and mentally destruct the organic structure. The use of

steroids provides an unjust advantage to non-user jocks and therefore should

remain illegal for non-medical usage. Drugs in athleticss can be a participant his or her

scholarship ( s ) and more earnestly, their lives.

Drug testing is a manner for athleticss functionaries to screen out the users and

independently penalize them by throwing them off the squad and sometimes throw outing them

from school. Performance heightening drugs have a major impact on athleticss and

jocks. The athleticss of today are sing more jobs with public presentation

heightening drugs chiefly because of the popularity of them ( 141 ) . There are

different effects for work forces and adult females but all of the jobs are really serious.

Deriving that small spot of fight can take to greater additions in

public presentation ( 139 ) . Steroids addition musculus mass and strength which helps

jocks recover quicker from hurts ( Bamberger 62 ) . Pat Butcher studies in

the Independent that the most common athleticss where you would happen the anabolic

steroids are in anaerobic exercise, football, path & A ; field, power events, and

weight-lifting. Weight lifting has reported the highest usage with

eight-teen-percent, football ten-percent, path and field follows with

four-percent, and baseball with two-percent ( Gildea 57 ) . Cycling has besides become

a athletics where public presentation drugs are found. Cyclists used the drugs non merely in

preparation but to help them in their races giving them that excess stat mi ( Dolan 29 ) .

Athletes come up with new and different ways of utilizing drugs to heighten their

public presentation without acquiring caught. Athletes use the drugs in rhythms. They use

the drug in cycl

Es of six to twelve hebdomads, followed by three to six months of

being drug-free, this is known as cycling ( Meer 61 ) . Athletes start off with a

low dose and so bit by bit increase to the highest point of usage ; this is

called pyramiding ( 57 ) . Performance heightening drugs can either be taken orally

or they can be injected. Lyle Alzado explained, “ the injected type is

normally injected into the butt so that there are no seeable cicatrixs ” ( Harris

91 ) . Oral signifiers include Winstrol, Anavar, Dianabol, and Andro-50, which athletes

can easy o.d. on these types of drugs, which can do serious heath

hurt and/or perchance decease ( 91 ) . Many athleticss installations have regulations and

ordinances against drug usage, so the squads and organisations perform drug trials

to extinguish the drug job in the organisations. I think that the usage of drug

trials is a good thought to dispatch the participants that have a drug maltreatment job.

Athletes today have the impulse to utilize the public presentation heightening drugs to do them

egos perform at a higher degree.

Drug testing of jocks demands to go more effectual to clamp down on

addendum usage. A recent clinical study taken on the drug proving policies in

colleges shows that out of two hundred and 45 schools, merely 29

per centum of those schools reported drug testing ( Bamberger 63 ) . With all the new

drugs out on the market it is virtually impossible to hold trials that can

place all the different drugs. Athletes have come up with new ways to get away

positive proving. Many of the world-class jocks are able to set their

normal dose so they can get away sensing ( Reilly 42 ) . Harmonizing to Hank Nuwer

most of the professional conferences and the NCAA have lists of banned drugs and

proving processs.

In 1983, the National Basketball Association set its drug policy and it is

now viewed as the most progressive in all athleticss. The NBA has the right to

administer drug trials to participants if it feels there is a demand to. In 1988 the NBA

expanded its policy to include random drug testing of the cubs that enter the

conference in their first twelvemonth. In 1990, the NCAA instituted a really stiff policy

sing steroids. The policy states that division one-football participants must

undergo a year-round, compulsory proving for steroids on a random footing ( Nuwer

17 ) .

I think that drug testing should be a compulsory event in every college

whether or non it is an invasion of their privateness.

A changeless conflict has been fought as the International Olympic Committee

battles to maintain drug proving up-to-date and effectual. We have come to

associate drug usage with a few celebrated names of fallen heroes, such as Ben

Johnson, but few realize merely how widespread drug usage is in Olympic athleticss and

how little a per centum of wrongdoers of all time acquire caught. Recent surveies show that

increased testing processs have done small to discourage jocks from trusting on

drugs to help public presentation and that drug usage among Olympic jocks is really on

the rise ( Dolan 29 ) . Performance-enhancing drug usage is non limited to the

Olympic games. There are few athleticss that have non been affected in some manner by

drug usage. The fact is that there are legion substances presently available

with possible benefits for jocks in all athleticss. Most professional athleticss do

non hold strict proving processs for public presentation heightening drugs for the

simple facts that there are excessively many drugs to prove for, and the trials are excessively

easy to crush says Hank Nuwer. This presents the International Olympic Committee

( IOC ) with one of it? s greatest challenges ; seeking to maintain it? s drug proving

processs on par with the engineering of today? s druggists ( 63 ) . Don Kardong

studies that the IOC faces major jobs when presenting these trials:

Is that many of these drugs can be cycled, where the athlete Michigans taking

doses long plenty in front of clip so that no hint of the drug will demo up in

urine samples. Another job is the proving process itself. Samples are

tested for a list of known substances, and since new drugs have to be used and

discovered in trials before the IOC is cognizant of them and can include them on the

list, those jocks who have entree to the newest merchandises have the advantage

of utilizing drugs non yet on the banned list.

In add-on, many of these jocks harmonizing to Jeff Meer have entree to the

same hi-tech equipment used by the IOC to observe drugs, leting them to

familiarise themselves with degrees of sensing and necessary clearance times

for different drugs. This is how many jocks are able to systematically avoid

proving positive, while keeping a diverse regimen of drugs. In add-on to

the troubles involved in observing many drugs and illegal processs, Meer

feels the IOC is faced with the enormous cost involved in implementing an

across-the-board proving protocol for all jocks. In his article? The Drug

Detectives? , Mike Lupica states that the IOC? is deploying hand-picked

technicians and three $ 700,000 high-resolution mass spectrometers? to execute

drug trials at a cost of approximately $ 800 per trial ( Lupica 1 ) . Although many recent

surveies estimate that approximately 80 per centum of all Olympic jocks are presently

utilizing, or have at some clip used, some type of performance-enhancing drug, merely

a smattering have of all time been caught and punished harmonizing to Hank Nuwer? s surveies

( 23 ) . This once more points to the inefficiency of the IOC? s attempts to decrease

the prevalence of drugs in Olympic competition. Due to the deficiency of success that

the IOC has had in commanding the rampant spread of drug usage, many have asked

why they do non merely travel with the popular tendencies and legalise the usage of these

drugs in competition. While most will hold that drug usage is now rampant

throughout the Olympics, extinguishing the trials and raising prohibitions would certainly

do the usage and maltreatment of these substances to increase dramatically. If allowed

into the Olympics and other athleticss, we would certainly see a drastic rise in the

black-market. While these prohibitions are forced, jocks who chose to stay natural

and vie without drugs still have a opportunity. Raising the prohibitions would

efficaciously force all serious Olympic aspirant to take potentially unsafe

drugs. Even with the current prohibitions and proving processs, ? the chauvinistic

driving force for Olympic competition has been athletic public presentation, and because

of this relationship, athleticss medical specialty has become an built-in constituent of the

Olympic motion? ( Tipton 2 ) . Another ground why the usage of these substances

is controlled is that many substances are potentially unsafe to the wellness of

the jock. Athletes have been known to endure from liver and kidney

disfunction to assorted signifiers of malignant neoplastic disease ( Rogak 96 ) . Many of the drugs today lack

the extended testing needed to foretell possible side effects and effects

of long-run usage ( 96 ) . Many would inquire why jocks would set themselves at such

enormous hazards to both their wellness and reputes. To many jocks, these

wagess of stardom are deserving any hazard. I mean, the common slogan in athleticss is? win

at all costs? . Americans do non trust for success from their jocks, they

expect and even demand it, and? exposing the populace to the darker side of

elite-level athleticss could bring forth negative sentiments towards the Olympic Games?

( Moore 4 ) . It seems that the best program for the IOC is to go on with their

current process, and implement proving wherever possible. The IOC is directing a

message to jocks, that they are cognizant of the usage of drugs but they will ne’er

condone it, and that they will go on to implement proving in an effort to

deter the spread of the usage of addendums throughout athleticss. With

continued support and research, the IOC may someday develop proving processs

more advanced than the engineering available to the jocks. This would

hopefully extinguish the usage performance-enhancing drugs and return professional

athleticss to a flat playing field that was originally intended. Because physicians

and IOC functionaries know really small about the many types of performance-enhancing

drugs and steroids, they have yet to come up with good ways of observing them

( 61 ) . Harmonizing to Michael Bamberger and Don Yaeger of Sports Illustrated, the

merely ways the IOC can prove right now is to utilize urine trials, a gaschromato graph,

and a high-resolution mass spectrometer, yet there are many ways to short-circuit all

three of these trials ( 61 ) . Besides, Bamberger and Yaeger note that, the

sophisticated jock who wants to take drugs has switched to things we can? t

even trial for. To be caught is non easy ; it merely happens, says David Reid,

manager of the doping control centre, when an jock is either improbably

sloppy, improbably stupid, or both ( 79 ) . Another manner to deceive drug trials is to

usage particular performance-enhancing drugs, which are made particularly for one

individual to make one specific responsibility. These drugs do non hold the same chemical parts

as the 1s the IOC trials for, and hence these jocks are non normally

caught. But, these drugs are highly expensive, sometimes bing the jocks

up to $ 1,500 a month ( Bamberger and Yaeger 64 ) . Besides, legal

performance-enhancing drugs such as creatine and androstenedione, which may besides

hold inauspicious side affects, and both of which are used by professional baseball

participant Mark McGwire, are seen as drugs that help a individual to go stronger and

better, without any of the negative consequences in which some illegal

performance-enhancing drugs and steroids can convey. Young jocks have heard

and seen that established jocks whom they admire use [ performance-enhancing

drugs ] , and they want to follow the same winning waies of their heroes ( Nuwer

12 ) . Harmonizing to an article written in the October 1998 issue of People Weekly,

& # 8230 ; gross revenues of the steroid ( androstenedione ) are expected to exceed $ 100 million this

twelvemonth, up from $ 5 million in 1997 ( 144 ) . Many of these gross revenues will be from younger

jocks viing at the high school degree, unaware of the dangers of this

legal substance. Harmonizing to a USA Today report, & # 8230 ; 175,000 teenage misss in

the United States have reported taking anabolic steroids at least one time within a

twelvemonth of the clip surveyed & # 8211 ; a rise of 100 % since 1991 ( Winner A3 ) . This compares

to the estimated 325,000 adolescent male childs who presently use steroids ( A3 ) .

George Will notes that? A society? s diversion is charged with moral

significance, athleticss and a society that takes it earnestly would be debased if

it did non purely for command things that blur the differentiation between the victory

of character and the victory of chemical science? ( Edelson 139 ) . One action that

these organisations must take in the close hereafter is to pass a batch of clip and

money on the survey of performance-enhancing drugs and steroids. Therefore, they would

be able to come up with better ways to be able to prove jocks. These

ordinances are needed non merely to protect the jocks, but besides to convey some

unity back to the universe of athleticss. These jocks care merely about themselves

and make non hold adequate subject and desire to develop difficult, the honest manner

without the usage of addendums.

Work Cited

Alvin, Virginia, and Robert Silerstein. Steroids: Large Muscles, Big Problems.

New Jersey: Enslow Publishers, Inc. , 1992: 64-68.

August, Paul N. Drugs and Women. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987

Bach, Julie S. , ed. Drug Abuse, Opposing View Points. St. Paul: Green oasis

Imperativeness, 1988.

Bamberger, Michael and Don Yeager. ? Over the Edge with Performance

Enhancing Drug

Use. ? Sports Illustrated v86: 14 April 1997: 60-64+

Blair, Tim. ? Just Say Go To The Latest Performance Boosting Drugs

Impossible To

Detect, and For Many Athletes, Impossible To Resist. ? Time International

27 July 1998.

Butcher, Pat. ? Live Fast, Die Young. ? Independent 23 September 1998.

Cowart, Virginia S. ? Athletes and Steroids- A Bad Bargain?

Saturday Evening Post 11 January 1987: 30-37.

Day, Michael. New Scientist. 10 October 1998: 45-46.

Dolan, Edward F. Drugs In Sports. New York: Sports Chrome East/West, 1986:

27-29.

Edelson, Edward. ? Sports Medicine. ? The Encyclopedia of Health. Chelsea

House

Publishers 1988: 135-141.

Gildea, William. ? Life and Drugs-In Sports Fast Lane. ? Readers Digest, 9

January

1988: 57-58.

Green, Gary A. Drugs and the Athlete. Delaware: Medical Journal, September

1987.

Harris, Jonathan. Drugged Athletes. New York: For Winds Press, 1987: 90-91+

Hazard Alert. Peoples Weekly v50 no13: 12 October 1998: 143-144.

Jaffe, Steven L. and Dynise Balcavage. Junior Drug Awareness? Steroids?

Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 1997.

Kardong, Don. ? Cherished Medal. ? Runners World. V33 no8: August 1998

70-73.

Lupica, Mike. ? The Drug Detective. ? Esquire September 1992: 23-25.

Meer, Jeff. ? Drugs and Sports. ? The Encyclopedia of Psychoactive Drugs.

New York:

Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. Vol. 2: 60-61,97.

Moore, Kenny. ? The U.S. Olympic Women Swimmers of 1976 Swept Into Montreal. ?

Sports Illustrated 13 July 1992.

Nardo, Don. Drugs and Sports. San Diego: Lucent Books, Inc. 1990: 15-24.

Nuwer, Hank. Steroids. New Jersey: Enslow Publishers, Inc. 1992: 15,17,19+

Papanke, John? Athletes or Role Models? ? Sports Illustrated 15 June 1997:

16-18.

Reid, David C. ? Sports Medicine? The Sports Encyclopedia 1997: 40-47.

Reilly, Rick. ? Hey Mac, Do What Comes Natural. ? Sports Illustrated: v90

no9: 1 March

1999: 42,90-91.

Rogak, Lisa A. Steroids: Dangerous Game. Minneapolis: Lerner Publications

Company,

1992. 95-98.

Telander, Rick? The Nightmare of Steroids. ? Sports Illustrated 24 October

1998.

Tipton, Paul. ? Dope and Glory. ? Runner? s World. December 1996: 2+

Voy, Robert M. Drugs, Sports, and Politics. Plain: Leisure Imperativeness 1991.

Wadler, Gary I. And Brian Hainline. Drugs and the Athlete. Philadelphia:

Davys

Company 1989.

Winner, Christopher P. ? Sports Doping Crisis Faces a Crossroads. ? USA

Today 28

September 1998: 2A-3A.

Wright, James E. and Virginia Cowart. Anabolic Steroids: Altered States New

Jersey:

National Institute 1989.

317